“First
Rate & Fashionable:”
Handmade
Nineteenth Century Furniture
at
the Tennessee State Museum
The Tennessee State Museum’s collection of pre-industrial furniture
enriches our lives as outstanding decorative art, and offers us an opportunity
to interpret the lives of the Tennessee artisans who created it. In an age of
nuclear energy and mass production, these surviving examples of regional
furniture with their hand-planed surfaces enable us to imagine a time when
Tennessee cabinetware was made meticulously by hand by local craftsmen.
Nineteenth century
Tennessee cabinetmakers seldom signed their work and usually let their products
speak for themselves, reflecting the tastes of makers and patrons in each region
of the state. The museum’s collection is significant in that ten of the thirty
pieces examined in this study retain signatures or other specific information
about their origins. Six of these pieces were signed by their makers. Owners and
merchants also signed furniture. An 1815 inscription by the unknown owner of a
Nashville sideboard reads “January 24th 1815 Bought this Side Board
of/ Capt. James Hicks, price $129.” An 1840s secretary is inscribed, “Titus
Woods & Co./ Memphis,” documenting the commission merchants who sold it.
And a secretary and bookcase made about 1865 has stenciled on its back:
“Manufactured by J. D. Miller/ Funeral Undertaker & Manufacturer of
Furniture/ Franklin/ Tenn.”
The inscriptions on
these pieces allow us to match other pieces which have identical construction
with their cabinetmakers. This documented furniture, together with early
nineteenth century newspaper advertisements, court records, and private papers,
helps recreate the world in which these craftsmen lived.
It is surprising how
quickly cabinetmakers and their sense of style arrived on the frontier, making
cabinetware to replace the bare rudiments of furnishings used by the first
settlers. Their pieces, often derivative of furniture back east, probably
reminded immigrants to Tennessee of their places of origin and made them feel
more at home. When John Donelson reached Nashville on April 24, 1780, he
“found a few log cabins which have been built on a cedar bluff above the Lick
by Capt. Robertson and his company.”[1] Yet only twenty years later, cabinetmaker Joseph
McBride’s fine desk was made for Donelson’s family.
The Great Wagon Road
through the Valley of Virginia was the major thoroughfare traveled by newcomers
into the Tennessee backcountry. The population of the Tennessee Territory
doubled from about 32,000 in 1790 to almost 67,000 in 1796, the year that
Tennessee became a state. By 1810 the number had grown to 261,727—nearly a 400
percent increase. The immigrants were mainly of English, Scot, and Scots-Irish
ancestry. This flood of settlers, seeking land and a fresh start, was soon
buying furniture made by local cabinetmakers. Tradesmen were drawn to the
frontier looking for less competitive markets than the ones they left behind in
Pennsylvania, Virginia, and the Carolinas. By 1850 there were over one million
people living in the state.[2]
Household furniture
was produced in rural and urban cabinet shops. Woodworkers in outlying regions
often combined farming with carpentry and made less sophisticated furniture than
that made in the developing towns. During the winter when their fields lay idle,
these farmer-artisans could increase their incomes with bench work. As the
state’s settlement moved westward, the development of large plantations in
Middle and West Tennessee increased the demand for elegant pieces to furnish new
dining rooms and parlors. Cabinetmakers were eager to accommodate wealthy
planters with pieces like the sideboard signed by Fayetteville’s Samuel S.
Holding about 1820.
Particularly in rural
areas, woodworking trades overlapped, enabling artisans to widen their markets.
Wheelwrights used their woodturning skills to make wagon wheels as well as
chairs with turned parts. Cabinetmakers made coffins and added the undertaking
business to that of furniture making. House joiners and carpenters made
cupboards, chests, and other utilitarian forms to answer the needs of their
patrons. Chairmakers, who painted their Windsor and fancy chairs, supplemented
their incomes by painting signs and houses. Cabinetmakers and carpenters also
did repair work to keep the cash flowing. Nashville carpenters John Austin and
Thomas Welch recorded several repairs in their daybook through the 1820s.
Typical entries include: “to putting rockers to chair,” “to shortening
bedstead,” “to putting top to table,” “cut hole in chair,” and “to
mending dining table.”[3]
Native timber used
for furniture making was sawn locally at reciprocating sawmills, fitted with
straight, vertical saw blades that moved up and down. These saws were first
driven by water and later powered by steam. Lumber sawn by circular saw blades
began to appear in southern furniture about 1835.[4]
The favored cabinet wood in Tennessee was cherry. Its color and grain made it
suitable to be used as a substitute for more expensive mahogany, which was
imported. Walnut, also native to Tennessee, was the second most desired cabinet
wood. A cabinetmaker could conserve his more valuable lumber by making the front
of a piece with cherry or walnut and then staining its cheaper tulip poplar
sides to match. Decorative mahogany, rosewood, and satinwood veneers were
imported for use on more expensive furniture. Maple was used primarily for chair
parts and bed posts, although some curly maple was used in case work. Red and
white oak, hickory, and ash were also used for chair parts.
The secondary or
unseen wood in furniture, for instance, the wood used for drawer bottoms and the
backs of case pieces, was usually native tulip poplar or yellow pine. Yellow
pine grew in the higher altitudes of East Tennessee. White pine, occasionally
used as a secondary wood, was listed in J. B. Killebrew’s 1874 edition of Resources
of Tennessee. It was described as being less abundant than yellow pine,
growing on the slopes of the eastern mountains and “found locally on the
Cumberland Table Land.”[5] Cedar and cypress also found some use as
secondary woods.
Inlay was used as a
furniture decoration to the greatest extent in East Tennessee. There was less in
Middle Tennessee cabinetware, and West Tennessee had the least number of inlaid
pieces. Lighter-colored woods like maple and holly were inserted to contrast
with the darker cherry and walnut furniture surfaces. Ornamentation included
line inlay, as well as pictorial inlay with motifs such as fans, eagles, rope
and tassel, gamecocks, and compass stars. The museum’s Wilson County desk
features owner Samuel McAdoo’s inlaid initials on the fall board. Carving was
another method of adorning furniture. The quarter-columns in the Donelson family
desk have flutes (concave grooves) carved into them. A fruit basket, eagle
heads, acanthus leaves, urns, and animal-paw feet are among the elaborate
carvings on John E. Rose’s secretary. Other carved motifs included fans and
shells. Furniture could also be enhanced with painted decoration.
Water-based and
alcohol-based stains were used to bring out the full beauty of wood grain, to
disguise cheaper woods, and to color the lighter sapwood of a board to match its
adjacent heartwood. The colorants could be made from local natural materials
such as walnut bark and butternut hulls.
Furniture made of
mahogany, cherry, and walnut was usually finished with copal varnish to add
luster to the wood grain and protect it from moisture and surface grime. This
varnish is made by dissolving gum copal (a natural brittle resin extracted from
tropical trees) in hot oil and then thinning it with turpentine. Shellac was
also available as a furniture finish. It is made with lac (the resinous
secretion of certain Asian insects) dissolved in alcohol. Beeswax could also be
used, melted and mixed with turpentine, rubbed on the surface, and then polished
when dry with a cloth. However, some early furniture remained unfinished. A
Putnam County carpenter-made chest has painted decoration brushed onto raw
cherry boards that have darkened with age. Inexpensive furniture made of poplar
or pine was often entirely painted.
Although
cabinet-trade workmen made many of their own hand tools, hardware merchants
supplied the bulk of them. Squares, rules, marking gauges, compasses, awls,
saws, planes, chisels, gouges, mallets, hammers, screwdrivers, braces and bits,
wood clamps, files, and drawknives were among the tools needed for making
furniture. Hardware stores also stocked cabinet hardware, hide glue, and
finishing materials. A cabinetmaker or wood turner could make the wooden
components for a woodturning lathe and purchase the metal parts from a
blacksmith. These machines were generally either hand-cranked, foot-treadled, or
water-powered. According to oral history, some were also driven by horses.
The cabinet and
chairmaking trades were commonly handed down in families from one generation to
the next. A newcomer to the business, usually a lad fourteen years old, learned
the trade through the apprenticeship system. Apprenticeship indentures, assigned
by the county courts, legally bound a boy to a master cabinetmaker until the age
of twenty-one. As an apprentice he provided the master with cheap labor. In
return, he learned the trade and received room, board, and often a set of tools.
At age twenty-one an apprentice became a journeyman cabinetmaker. After setting
up his own business he was considered a master.
According to oral
tradition, some plantation slaves in Tennessee were trained in the woodworking
trades. Franklin chairmaker Richard Poyner learned his trade from his slave
master, Robert Poyner. The Poyner family moved from Halifax County, Virginia, to
Williamson County in 1816. Richard Poyner purchased his freedom in the 1850s and
became recognized as one of the area’s most popular chairmakers.[6]
Cabinetmakers could
find further instruction in drafting and design in books. London’s leading
furniture designers were tremendously influential in guiding the fashion and
construction of American furniture. In 1754, Thomas Chippendale published The
Gentleman & Cabinetmaker’s Director, and in 1788, George Hepplewhite
issued The Cabinet-Maker and
Upholsterer’s Guide. Thomas Sheraton’s The Cabinetmaker and
Upholsterer’s Drawing-Book was published in 1791. These
books contained elaborate drawings for examples in the prevailing furniture
styles. The February 17, 1816, estate inventory of Nashville cabinetmaker Daniel
McBean included “Cabinet Maker’s Guide 2 Vols. - $22.”[7]
This was a significant sum of money as evidenced by a china press from the same
sale valued at $23. The book may have been Hepplewhite’s The Cabinet-Maker
and Upholsterer’s Guide. If surviving examples of McBean’s work were
located they could be compared with Hepplewhite’s drawings for similarities.
Tennessee furniture makers made vernacular interpretations of the
Sheraton and Hepplewhite styles years after they were outdated in London. Their
pieces were either high-style or plain-style depending on the skill of the maker
and the status of the customer. Highly-skilled urban artisans like James McBride
and James G. Hicks probably owned English design books to guide them in making
sophisticated pieces for wealthy patrons. The average farmer, with conservative
taste and modest means, generally sought plainer furniture from rural craftsmen.
These cabinetmakers based their pieces on wooden patterns or copies of patterns
and drawings used in the shops where they apprenticed, and then adapted them to
the tastes of their patrons.
The 1820
Manufacturers’ Census contains information about cabinet shops in many areas
of the state. Business owners were asked to record materials used, number of
employees, expense and production figures, and general remarks concerning the
demand for their products. Roane County cabinetmaker William Galbraith, who made
a desk now in the museum’s collection, listed raw materials of cherry, walnut,
and poplar plank worth $85, with one person employed. He invested $270 and sold
$600 worth of furniture annually. Galbraith did not comment on the demand for
his furniture. However, David Patton, a Shelbyville cabinetmaker, recorded on
his census questionnaire, “This is a tolerable good business but the sales is
not fast.”[8]
The highest production in the state was listed by an unnamed Nashville
cabinetmaker, probably James B. Houston, who reported $6,000.[9]
The 1850 U.S.
population census had a Schedule of Products and Industry attached to it. The
industrial census included businesses earning a minimum of $500 annually. This
restriction excluded many small shops and part-time cabinetmakers. James W.
McCombs and William R. Cornelius of Nashville owned the state’s largest
furniture-making concern, with sixteen men working for them. According to the
census, they made 360 pieces of furniture valued at $18,000.[10]
Tennessee cabinetmakers made desks, secretaries, bookcases, chests,
bureaus, tables, candlestands, sideboards, slabs, safes, cellarets, presses,
sugar chests, cupboards, tall case clocks, bedsteads, cradles, chairs, settees
and sofas. The slab was a furniture form related to the sideboard, consisting of
a high table, often containing drawers. Safes, which were case pieces with
pierced tins, were used for food storage and were placed in kitchens. The holes
in the tins were punched in decorative patterns and provided air circulation.
Cellarets, also called bottle cases, were used to store wines or liquors. Framed
chairs, made by cabinetmakers, were usually varnished and had upholstered seats.
These chairs had parts with squared edges that were hand-worked with saws and
planes. Turned chairs, made by chairmakers, contained round elements that were
shaped on woodturning lathes. They included ladderbacks, Windsors, and fancy
chairs. A turned chair was made of a mixture of woods and was typically painted
to give it a unified appearance. Its seat could be made of solid wood or of
woven materials such as rush, cane, corn shucks, or oak or hickory splints.
The Jackson press and
the sugar chest are forms particularly associated with Tennessee.
A sugar chest was a
square or rectangular box with a lid, elevated on a frame which usually
contained a drawer. Tapered or turned legs supported the piece. The chest’s
interior was partitioned into two or three bins for storing large amounts of
white or loaf sugar, brown sugar, and unroasted coffee beans. In the first half
of the nineteenth century, sugar was a valuable commodity kept under lock and
key. A sugar chest in the dining room was considered a symbol of affluence. As
sugar became less expensive, the form gradually became outdated. Related forms
include sugar desks, sugar bureaus, and sideboard sugar chests.
Woodworking tools and
the process of making furniture did not change much until the mid- nineteenth
century. Tennessee cabinetmakers of 1800 used the same hand-cut mortise-and-tenon
joints to join boards as had craftsmen in ancient Greece. However, the
Industrial Revolution, with its steam-powered factories, changed the way
Americans worked and lived. The new technology encouraged the development of
mass-produced furniture. Made in cities like Cincinnati, Pittsburgh, and
Philadelphia, by 1850 it had begun its gradual takeover of the market as bench
work carried out in small cabinet shops could not compete economically.
The surviving
regional furniture of early Tennessee woodworkers testifies to their skills,
creativity and adaptability in the southern backcountry. On display in the
Tennessee State Museum, their pieces inspire visitors from around the world,
transporting their imaginations to the time when handmade furniture was
considered “First Rate & Fashionable.”[12]
This publication
catalogs twenty-eight objects drawn from the holdings at the Tennessee State
Museum, including two Tennessee Historical Society collection pieces and two
objects that are long-term loans to the museum. They represent a broad spectrum
of early Tennessee furniture, from simple carpenter-made chests, to the elegant
secretary made by John Erhart Rose. Date, place of origin, and the name of the
maker when known appear at the head of each catalog entry. A description of the
construction of each piece is given at the end of each entry. Separate essays
about apprenticeship and how to identify early furniture follow, as well as a
glossary.
![]()
[1] Samuel Cole Williams, Early Travels in the Tennessee Country, 1540-1800 (Johnson City, Tennessee, 1928), 242.
[2] Derita Coleman Williams and Nathan Harsh, The Art and Mystery of Tennessee Furniture and Its Makers Through 1850 (Nashville, 1988), ix, 9.
[3] John Austin and Thomas Welch 1819-1831 daybook, Williamson County Archives, 1-373, passim.
[4] John Bivens, Jr., The Furniture of Coastal North Carolina (Winston-Salem, 1988), 77.
[5] J. B. Killebrew, Introduction To The Resources of Tennessee(1874; reprint, Spartanburg: The Reprint Company, 1974), 86-87.
[6] Richard Warwick, “A Century of Chairmakers,”Williamson County Historical Society Publication 22 (Spring 1991): 6-8. Rick Warwick’s research on Poyner is an important addition to the growing body of scholarship on African-American furniture makers in the nineteenth century South. Thomas Day of North Carolina has been studied in depth while other research has identified the furniture of Henry Boyd, a former Kentucky slave who worked in Cincinnati, and William Kunze, another former slave who worked in St. Charles, Missouri. More research on slave furniture makers in Tennessee would be welcome; certainly evidence exists, such as the story related by Columbia’s Caroline Nicholson in her memoirs about her father’s slave carpenter and interior work he carried out on her Columbia home. For valuable contextual work recently carried out on North Carolina and Geogia, see Johanna Miller Lewis, Artisans in the North Carolina Backcountry (Lexington, 1995) and Michelle Gillespie, Free Labor in an Unfree World: White Artisans in Slaveholding Georgia, 1789-1860 (Athens, 2000).
[7] Williams and Harsh, 325.
[8] Census of Manufacturers, Middle Counties of Tennessee, 1820, 120.
[9] Williams and Harsh, 15.
[10] Ibid., 17.
[11] Ibid., 51.
[12] Headline of advertisement for John E. Rose, Knoxville Register, 29 July 1825.